oint we would specify a volume level negative right, >>> >>> Negative rights: >>> system:anonusers idwka >> >> Why do you need a group, as opposed to simply mapping 32766 to a name? > > Yes, I suppose just a way to represent ANONYMOUSID (32766) would > work, but the system: prefix seems intuitive to me and more > consistent with system:anyuser and system:authuser.
Well, those are groups of identities: "all authenticated users" or "all authenticated users plus anonymous", anonymous is but one identity! -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
