* Andrew Deason <[email protected]> [20091112 12:13]: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:51:11 -0500 > Michael Meffie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It seems to me that restricting system:authuser would be less common > > > than anyuser/anonymous, but it still could be useful; and we have > > > other methods that cover the use case. > > > > I'm failing to see a use case here. Anyone on this list have a > > concrete example? > > In other words: *** PLEASE SPEAK UP *** if you want to be able to > prevent normal users from doing something like "fs setacl ${HOME} > system:authuser rlidwka" even when they have the 'a' bit on ${HOME}. > > Even if it's just "+1, yes, I want that", please say something. >
We'd certainly appreciate that capability at our site. +1 Ben -- ________________________________________________________________________ PGP key updated: http://www.reed.edu/~benp/key-transition-2009-05-11.txt PGP (318B6A97): 3F23 EBC8 B73E 92B7 0A67 705A 8219 DCF0 318B 6A97
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
