-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey Altman wrote: > John W. Sopko Jr. wrote: > >> Why is it a bug? Is the plan to eventually use the SRV record >> in place of the AFSDB record for clients? >> >>> If the site relies on AFSDB records, either >>> stick with 1.5.65 or add the new DNS SRV records for >>> >>> _afs3-vlserver._udp.<cellname> IN SRV 0 0 7003 >> We added the SRV record and things seem to be working. I am using >> on a 1.5.66 with KFW. > > > It is a bug because the 1.5.66 client doesn't work when the AFSDB > records are all that is available. DNS SRV records are the future but > we don't want to break sites that do not deploy them.
There are sites which could NOT apply the DNS SRV entries as of policy of the DNS server owner :-( But so far the 1.5.66 (windows) release does work with AFSDB only for us (means: with only CellservDB file). MfG, Lars Schimmer - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: [email protected] Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksLlGEACgkQmWhuE0qbFyOsLgCfU0Ioc0GxO6KOIg3ngODWH4WE t3EAn07GYh5TaWvBgU7EN0CPeXS7FbYY =ru9v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
