On 9 Jan 2010, at 12:17, sabah s. salih wrote:

I tried running

fs checkvolumes

to copy files from local client machines to the server.

fs checkvolumes doesn't do this. As it says in the man page
"The fs checkvolumes command discards the table of mappings between volume names and volume ID numbers that the Cache Manager stores in memory and uses when fetching data from volumes. The next time an application requests AFS data, the Cache Manager must contact the Volume Location (VL) Server for volume location information, and then
       an appropriate file server machine for the actual data."

Is there any other way to list files cashed in the local clients and copy them to the server?

There is no tool currently available to do this. It's theoretically possible that you might be able to recover some data in this way, but how much you can regain will depend on how much is still in client caches, and how much of the cell's state is still the same as when the data is lost. Information is stored in the AFS cache in a set of chunks, with each file being comprised of a number of chunks - only those chunks which have been read from a given client will be in that clients cache. Information in the cache is indexed, not by the filename, but by the AFS FID (a numerical identifier). Being able to link files back into the correct location in the directory tree will require knowing what all of the volume identifiers were at the time the data was lost (which may be difficult if you have recreated new volumes with the old names), and being able to recover all of the directories which were in the path of that location.

In addition, the client never saves to disk file metadata (ownership, Unix mode bits), and never sees directory ACL data, so that information will not be available from the clients.

It's possible that you might be able to partially reconstruct some data by going down this route, although how much really does depend on the way your cell is used, and the actions you've taken since the data was lost. If you did want to explore this further, your best bet would probably be to speak to one of the companies offering AFS consultancy ( see http://www.openafs.org/support.html ) with regards to developing such a tool, and going through the steps of combining the data it produces back into a directory tree.

Cheers,

Simon.

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to