-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anders Magnusson wrote: > Lars Schimmer wrote: >> Right now I see the limit of 20 groups per ACL in a directory as a >> problem - but thats a point we could work araound, somehow. >> > You should use as few ACL entries as possible and instead put users/groups > in groups on the directories. IMHO something is setup wrong if you have > more than ~5 ACLs on a directory.
I know, that means for ~100 organizations in one cell, to use supergroup features for a widely accessable volume (not system:authusers). It is possible, but needs some ideas ahead ;-) > -- Ragge MfG, Lars Schimmer - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: [email protected] Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktgBMgACgkQmWhuE0qbFyN+AACdG0mRdJz2s9qYuIisbAVjsyXF +KIAniMxxW6Qy2ul+xfKF5WUeEh8I0p0 =ADic -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
