> On 01/29/2010 05:56 AM, David Boyes wrote: > It's bothered me for some time that a basic infrastructure item like AFS is > distributed in a way that bypasses the OS software management system on most > platforms. I guess it's a time/resources thing, but still -- seems wrong, > somehow. It's not that hard to do, especially on Solaris and AIX. >
On a related note, I'm working on an OpenAFS package for IRIX for Nekoware. > On 01/29/2010 06:31 AM, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > Ultimately this is the key issue. Until it becomes a high priority for > someone, and that person publishes the necessary configuration, this isn't > going to improve. Equally critically, we need people to take responsibility > for maintaining the packaging as releases occur. > I guess that makes me a volunteer! :) > On 01/29/2010 07:43 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > If you would like to participate in release building, please add > yourself to the release-team mailing list and participate in the > release team Jabber meetings that occur prior to each release. > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Good to know -- done. -Chaz ____________________________________________________________ FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
