On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:16:48 -0500 > Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) >> [email protected] wrote: >> >> > As a follow up to your response- will this problem "go away" for >> > kernel version 2.6.33? If so, perhaps I can upgrade to that version. >> > >> > As an alternative- can I fix this by downgrading the kernel to some >> > lesser version (say 2.6.30)? >> >> "The IMA problem" effectively exists in 2.6.30-2.6.32. > > ...however, Simon tells me that the fedora 2.6.30 packages may not have > enabled IMA, so he's probably right that 2.6.30 would be fine.
Yeah, pretty sure there was no Fedora 2.6.30 kernel with IMA enabled, that came with 2.6.31. The problem with the IMA fix as it was done in 2.6.33 is that it makes substantial changes to how/where the IMA accounting is done - probably not something you'd want as-is for 2.6.32-stable. What I hope is that Fedora 12 will get an update to 2.6.33 in the not too distant future. If we take 2.6.32 as an example, it was added to F12 roughly a month after its release, and 2.6.33 was released on Feb. 24. I don't know what the plan is, and looking in Koji I haven't seen any 2.6.33 builds targeted for F12 yet. Marc _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
