On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:21:30 -0400 Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/12/2010 8:54 AM, Atro Tossavainen wrote: > > Jeffrey, thanks for the superfast response. > > > >> What version of OpenAFS? What does the address report if you use > >> the udebug from the sparc system to query the x86 system? I believe > >> this is just a reporting problem with udebug client that was fixed > >> on master. Yeah, 63fe055ecd13c93a3a6070a15a745ace2e420817, not on 1.4 yet. It's just cosmetic. > > The a.b.c.d becoming d.c.b.a seems to be just cosmetic, but there are > > some other issues. Out of 128.214.58.174 and 128.214.88.114, the > > lowest numbered host certainly isn't 128.214.88.114, > > actually it is because that server is reporting multiple addresses: > > Server( 128.214.88.114 10.0.0.3 172.16.0.1 172.17.0.1 172.18.0.1 ) > > several of which are lower than 128.214.58.174. What are these other > interface addresses are do you expect them to be used for ubik > synchronization? If you want the other db server to be the lowest host, you can restrict the addresses advertised with NetInfo/NetRestrict. But if that doesn't matter to you, there doesn't seem to be a problem. Are you seeing other issues with the database itself? -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
