> the ideal situation is we'd just use the one srpm already available > from openafs.org for the release.
This would be preferable, but for example my RPM packaging skills are not that good to write the prereqs depending on the distro and version. The distros do have different names on the packages. So I prefer to get the SRPM that gets produced alongside the RPM in the rpmbuild process until we get to the unified RPM nirvana. Harald. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
