In message <[email protected]>,Russ Allbery writes: >POD is capable of including enough information that you could get them >back, and most of the high-level references are still there. The >low-level references (to specific sections of particular pieces of >documentation) would need additional annotations.
yes, pod is but i dont believe any of the linkage tags where preserved when the documentation was converted over from the .html. i have dreams of re-doing the conversion to get the links and diff between the two trees to put the links back. >On the other hand, I'm not sure how large the audience is for that work >any more. Printing things like this out has I think become a lot less which is why i think the cross references between the man pages is somewhat useful. when formatted as html it makes is easier to go see the reference command -- just follow the link. however, i dont recall how much there was. this would sort of determine whether or not this would even be worth the effort. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
