On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:22:33 -0500 Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:41:01 +0200 > Arne Wiebalck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Looking into the code of fs I see that 'lsm' resolves > > symlinks before the stat pioctl, while 'rmm' does not. > > Is there any particular reason for this? > > You would rather it remove the target of the symlink? 'rm' and 'rmdir' > don't work like that, either. Actually, I'm sorry, I realize I misread your original post. I thought you were running 'fs rmm' where the last component was a symlink, but you ran it where one of the intermediary components was a symlink. This is possibly some odd quirk of the code to not resolve the mountpoint when trying to remove it, but I'll need to look. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
