Tom Keiser <[email protected]> writes: > Ok. That's a perfectly fair rationale. What I still don't understand > is why people think _OpenAFS_ should strive to ship (and thus implicitly > endorse) code that introduces such non-determinism (especially given > that, as Andrew pointed out, under DAFS enabling fast-restart semantics > will quite literally involve a 1-line out-of-tree, unsupported > change)...
At the point at which it's a one-line change, though, the argument that it makes the code harder to maintain doesn't really apply. At that point, it should be possible to make it a command-line flag around which we put huge giant flashing warnings and then can leave in the tree if people really want to use it at their site. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
