On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 20 Jun 2010, at 04:11, Derrick Brashear wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Matt W. Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> wow. do we want that? replacement for rt? >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> ----- "Adam Megacz" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> FYI >>>> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=124 >> >> Speaking personally, I don't. I prefer RT to bugzilla. Something else >> might be better but I have no interest in touching bugzilla. > > No matter, this ticket doesn't actually give bugzilla integration at all. > What it does do is provide indexing of a git footer entry that contains a > reference to an external tracking ID, so you can search the gerrit UI for > that ID. > > We already use 'FIXES <blah>' for a similar purpose - but this won't be > compatible with this change, because it's not a git footer. I suppose we > should consider whether we want to continue using 'FIXES', or if we want to > move to something like 'Fixes: <blah>' which would be more compatible with > git's world view.
I assume since the commit messages are part of the sha1, we can't do back and rewrite the world we have. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
