Thanks -- that resolved that mystery. Is the quick start guide just out of date? How are we, as a community, maintaining it? The RHEL section also tells you to download "openafs-kernel-*", but the actual rpms are named "kmod-openafs-*". Nowhere does it tell you to download and install "openafs-krb5".
If someone points me at the source for the documentation, I'd be happy to submit patches. I think there are some other subtle inaccuracies as well, like requiring the -cell argument to the bos command, when using -noauth. Unless I'm just wrong on that last point :-P On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Rick Cochran <[email protected]> wrote: > In RHEL5: > > arctura> which asetkey > /usr/sbin/asetkey > arctura> rpm -q -f `which asetkey` > openafs-krb5-1.4.12-el5.1.1 > > > > On 09/28/2010 03:05 PM, Phillip Moore wrote: > >> For the first time in over 10 years, I'm finally getting around to playing >> with >> OpenAFS again. �I'm trying to setup a test cell on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 VM. >> �I'm >> working off of the UNIX Quick Start Guide at: >> >> http://docs.openafs.org/QuickStartUnix/..... >> >> I've had no problems until I'm supposed to set the AFS server encryption >> key, >> but the instructions say: >> >> 1. >> >> #*asetkey add* </|kvno|/> */etc/afs.keytab afs/*</|cell name|/ >> >> >> and there's no asetkey to be found. �I've installed the following RPMs >> downloaded from openefs.org <http://openefs.org>: >> >> >> openafs-1.4.12-el5.1.1.x86_64.rpm >> openafs-client-1.4.12-el5.1.1.x86_64.rpm >> openafs-server-1.4.12-el5.1.1.x86_64.rpm >> kmod-openafs-1.4.12-1.1.2.6.18_164.15.1.el5.x86_64.rpm >> >> Googling for solutions, it looks like asetkey has been around for a long >> time, >> but it was not installed with these rpms. �Was there another package I >> missed? >> �I've followed the docs pretty much to the letter so far. >> >> I'm guessing I can use "bos addkey" to do this, but asetkey was supposed >> to >> replace that, right? >> >> Is this a case of the Quick Start Guide documenting the procedures for >> 1.5, when >> I've chosen to download 1.4.12? � I can easily switch to the latest and >> greatest >> release, but I would prefer to start with 1.4.12, since I want to be sure >> the >> code I am developing works for the releases "in the field". � The last >> thing I >> need right now is for my code to only work with the bleeding edge. >> >> >> >>
