> > What's the tried-and-true production-quality Linux > > equivalent? Anything? Last I read, nothing. > > We are about to bring up a new fileserver with ext4. We've been > running > ext4 for several months in non-AFS production boxes and were very happy > with the performance - measurably faster than ext3 for large file i/o.
It (ext4) is faster, but still has some pretty significant integrity problems at very high I/O rates. It's buffer management code is also pretty spotty. Doesn't hurt much in dedicated machines, but sucks rocks in virtual machines. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
