Am 28.09.2010 21:49, schrieb Russ Allbery: > Jeff Blaine <jbla...@kickflop.net> writes: > >> What's the tried-and-true production-quality Linux equivalent? >> Anything? Last I read, nothing. > > There's nothing really equivalent to ZFS. > >> Barring an equivalent, what Linux setup... > >> a) seems most stable >> b) is fsck-less > >> Even quick grunt responses are appreciated. > > We use ext3. It isn't the fastest or the most featureful, but it's the > core file system that everyone uses on Linux and for us it's been rock > solid. You're the least likely to run into strange problems. > > Lots of people also use XFS, and it should be reasonably stable. I would > avoid ReiserFS and JFS due to lack of developers and widespread use. > > ext4 is getting to the point that it's mature enough to use, but I'm not > sure I'd trust it yet.
I run btrfs already, which is (or will be) equivalent to ZFS (somehow).
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
