On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:40:17 +0100 Jakub Witkowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> AFSLore Wiki was probably started with that idea but, frankly, it > looks broken and inspires little confidence. So, make it look better. Someone good with CSS just needs to spend a few minutes with it to make it not look like it's a static HTML 2.0 web page from the 90s. The thing is, for user-contributed content, we already have a system that we like (well, that I like, at least). Speaking only for myself, I don't want to have to go through a plone web interface to add documentation or make a correction, if I go through git and gerrit to do everything else. If you can get plone or whatever other CMS to pull information submitted to git, then that's fine, and I don't really care what you use in order to do that. But I'd rather not have to create a second account and use an entirely separate process for "web stuff". Source and non-wiki documentation changes already go through gerrit, and I for one think it works quite well. (And if AFSLore wiki changes did, too, I'd contribute more to it) -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
