On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:07:15 +0000 Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 Dec 2010, at 04:28, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Features that are backwards-incompatible, and cause nontrivial > > downtime to revert, I'd hope we'd wait at least a release. > > We could easily structure this change in a way that preserved > backwards compatibility. I'd like to hear how you plan to do that. Old bosservers deal poorly with new BosConfig directives, and a new BosConfig directive is how current bosservers turn on restricted mode. > > And keep in mind I'm trying to think of stable release cycles in > > terms of what was discussed at BPW 2010, not the glacial pace of > > e.g. 1.2 -> 1.4. It wouldn't/shouldn't take that long. > > We have still to demonstrate that we can rapidly make stable releases. > 1.6 is taking an age to get out of the door, primarily due to demand > attach. DAFS has had nothing to do with this for at least the past 6 months. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
