On 1/31/2011 10:29 AM, David Bear wrote:
> Thanks. This is good to know. Is this new behavior? (relatively new) On
> older clients we did see AFS registering this name on a public
> interface. In our highly segmented/subnetted network, it was very
> difficult to track down the offender sometime.

If it did it was a bug that has never been reported to OpenAFS.
The only adapter that can have "AFS" bound to is one that is registered
on the system as a "loopback" adapter, "*msloop".  If there is a machine
that has "AFS" bound to a public interface, I would like to see evidence
of that and I will provide a tool to dump the relevant network
configuration state.

Jeffrey Altman

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to