On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Jason Edgecombe <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/24/2011 08:05 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: >> >> Jason Edgecombe<[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Jonathan Nilsson pointed out to me that the recommended file server >>> options are not documented anywhere. As I recall, I pestered Jeff& >>> Derrick at the 2008 workshop, and my current settings came from that and >>> possibly some private conversations with Jeff& Derrick. >>> Are there any objections to putting the following options in the man >>> pages >>> and guides as recommended fileserver options: >>> fileserver -L -udpsize 131071 -sendsize 131071 -rxpck 700 -p 128 >>> -b 600 -nojumbo -cb 1500000 >> >> I have no objections, but I think it would be even better to just modify >> the definition of -L so that it does the above instead. But that's >> probably a 1.6 or later thing, so we still have a documentation issue for >> 1.4 and possibly (given that we're in rc's already) for 1.6. >> > > I agree with both of your points.
Credit where due, Jeffrey Hutzelman did a lot of work in figuring out his optimal setup. His document is the one you should be including (rewritten perhaps) so there is rationale and not just a string of arguments. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
