>> I plan to run my two (1.6.0) openafs servers (both are vl pt vol and >> dafs servers) in a failover configuration (the failover supervised by >> a redhat-cluster installation). The data is on a SAN which is attached >> to both servers. > I assume you want this for high-availability of RW data? Yes. >> Please tell me if I've overlooked anything. Won't get the the vl and >> pt server confused from running on both addresses declared in >> CellServDB in case of failover? > Yes they will. Why don't you just have a single service IP address, and > have the nodes in an active-passive configuration? When the primary goes > down, the secondary takes the service IP and starts up all of its > processes. It seems like that may be simpler. > Probably I'm going to implement this. But need to redesign some details: separate the pt and vl server instances (to separate boxes, at least virtually) from the volume and file-server (which is going to be subject of this high availability approach).
Thank you! Geza _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
