Thanks.
I applied the patch(es) below [c39d0161552bf69affe839fcb36dfb858dbaedc1]
to the 1.4.14 tree, which, judging from the number of rejects, wasn't
the intent.
Was this done against 1.4.12?
In any case, not sure what I hosed manually going through the .rej
files, but ended up with an unworkable solution -- salvage/exam/other
funcs broken.
Have reverted to 1.4.14 original source and made a single change to
declaration of vid in vol-salvage.c in src/vol, which gets salvager
working. Haven't yet applied Andrew's patch, but will.
I've got more time to fiddle with this. Should I apply the
c39d0161552bf69affe839fcb36dfb858dbaedc1 patch to 1.4.12 and report back
with that as well?
Kim
On 3/11/2011 9:18 AM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
You will want Andrew's patch http://gerrit.openafs.org/#change,4199 to
the salvager.
On 3/11/2011 11:11 AM, Kim Kimball wrote:
Thanks much.
I'll report back with results.
Kim
On 3/10/2011 1:21 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 3/10/2011 2:49 PM, Kim Kimball wrote:
You're right. Looking at the 1.4.14 source and comparing with what the
patches intended, it's clear the patch(es) never made it into the 1.4.14
release.
There are patches here
http://web.mit.edu/jaltman/Public/OpenAFS/patches/vlserver-volid-1.patch
that is not the final patch that was applied to master and is quite
incomplete. The full patchset to master is
SHA1: c39d0161552bf69affe839fcb36dfb858dbaedc1
This was not applied to 1.4.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
