Thank you for information. I tried to use memory cache and it was only a bit faster than using disk cache, the limiting factor being apparently fileserver consuming available CPU system time on networking. Using -jumbo helped somewhat, but observing the facts that limited memory cache means more frequent misses and that repeated reads are much faster from the disk cache than from the local fileserver, I returned back to a disk cache. It seems that in my case the best performance solution for both local and remote files would be using a disk cache on a separate fast drive (SSD).
_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
