Hello all, would this be a name change for /usr/sbin/backup only, or would /usr/afs/bin/backup also be affected by this proposed name change?
Regards, Peter. PS: I personally do not see the need for a name change on our part, CODA could have a codabackup? On Jul 5, 2011, at 17:37 , Steve Simmons wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > >> On 07/04/2011 10:14 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote: >>> In >>> message<cad3fbmwn1fpxwxxc+32p02jfqyxxergszzz2g4gzxq0hmuh...@mail.gmail.com>,Ken >>> Dreyer writes: >>>> The /usr/sbin/backup binary in OpenAFS conflicts with a binary of the >>>> same name in Coda. Before RPM Fusion renames the binary (eg. >>>> backup.afs), do any other distros have existing conventions for >>>> avoiding this particular conflict? >>> based on other commands, there would appear to be precedent for either >>> prefixing an a (aklog) or an afs (afsmonitor) >> afsbackup sounds ok. > > Seconded._______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info ________________________________________________________________________________ Peter van der Reest Information Technology - Information Fabrics Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron - DESY - A Research Centre of the Helmholtz Association phone: +49 40 8998 3315 Notkestrasse 85 fax: +49 40 8994 3315 D-22607 Hamburg e-mail: [email protected] Germany ________________________________________________________________________________
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
