On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:36:16 -0400 Dale Pontius <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's certainly better than using regular ping, since it's going to > go through the AFS message queues, etc. In fact, the coworker next > door has been having some problems, and we tried this method in > another window on another client machine right as his script slowed > down, and saw a 20 second round trip time. rxdebug (in this method of operation) doesn't work just like "ping" does. Returning after 20 seconds doesn't mean packets take 20 seconds to traverse back and forth; it probably means some packets were dropped and we just retried. I think rxdebug waits for 1 second, and then retries and waits 2 seconds, then 4 seconds, etc. We probably could provide something closer to a normal "ping" utility. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
