Given we have "AlwaysAttach", "NeverAttach" would seem to be the obvious opposite.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:18:38 -0500 > Jason Edgecombe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > What I think would be an even more useful feature is the ability to >> > detach and reattach a partition on another server (via SAN storage or >> > whatever), since there aren't very good workarounds for that. If we >> > could do that, we could also just detach a partition and reattach it to >> > the same server again. >> >> May I suggest an alternate approach? >> >> In http://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=130561 >> I documented an idea about a "DoNotAttach" flag. While this would not >> allow for hot adds and hot removals, it would allow you to flag a >> /vicepX folder for removal. After that, just schedule a service restart. > > Yeah, that sounds useful and easy to do, to me. I don't entirely > consider it an alternate approach in that it is a full replacement for > what I wrote above, but it would certainly be useful. > > -- > Andrew Deason > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
