On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well that's definitely not coming from us; we're not going to set a
> sysname like 'fedora' (though setting a distribution-specific sysname
> does make sense). A brief look at the rpmfusion packaging suggests it
> may be coming from SYSNAMELIST in /etc/sysconfig/openafs .  And the
> default config file sets it to
>
> SYSNAMELIST="${_ARCH}_${_DIST}_${_REL} ${_ARCH}_linux${_KERN}"
>
> Which is not correct, or at least doesn't seem like a reasonable default
> to me, since most sites will be using amd64_linux26 by default. File a
> bug with the rpmfusion packaging, or tell me where I should.

I'm a maintainer at RPM Fusion along with Jack, and I'd be fine with
setting ${_ARCH}_linux26 as an additional fallback. Will this work?

I am curious when OpenAFS will actually going to move their Linux
sysname to linux3 :-)

- Ken
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to