Russ Allbery wrote: > Andrew Deason <[email protected]> writes: > >> Secondly, this is easily modifiable by distributions. I think the >> closest thing Linux has to a "platform" like those of commercial unices >> (and maybe the BSDs) is a distribution-specific moniker. Just because >> the OpenAFS project doesn't include anything more specific than >> "$arch_linux26" by default doesn't mean we can't have a distro-specific >> tag by default in front of that (and the RPMs related to this thread are >> already doing that). That seems like a pretty easy way to get more >> granularity and be more 'modern'. > I suppose I could do that in Debian. I'd feel more comfortable doing it > if any Debian user had ever indicated a desire for an @sys that identified > the Debian stable version (which would be the obvious thing to put in > there). > > If I do that for Debian, though, Ubuntu is going to be a mess.
We have been using:
afs_arch=`dpkg --print-architecture`
afs_version=`lsb_release -s -r | sed -e 's/\.//g' | tr -d "[a-zA-Z]"`
afs_dist=`lsb_release -s -i|tr "[:upper:]" "[:lower:]"`
afs_sysname="${afs_arch}_${afs_dist}${afs_version}"
for years, on ubuntu.
/Björn
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
