On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:20:20 +0000 Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> That limit is imposed because it is the point at which the current RX > implementation loses the queue efficiency/throughput tradeoff. You can > run with a larger window size, but it will actually make things go > slower. > > It was naively increasing the maximum window size to 255 that caused > the huge performance problems in the 1.5.x series that Andrei > highlighted at the 2010 European AFS workshop. Yes, I know, that's what I'm talking about. Even if we didn't have that problem, a window size of 255 is still prohibitively small for many uses. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
