On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:51:51 +0200 Lars Schimmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The installation is just for writing codes later and I don't need to > > care much about the security, kaserver is simpler to test. > > If thats the case, please use a stable, working installation with > potential for future use. > Which will be a working 1.6.1pre4 or trunk. > And kerberos 5 and no more kaserver. Actually, if you don't need any security at all, you may be able to get by without kaserver or a krb5 kdc. If you start bosserver with -noauth, and 'bos addkey' some random key, I think you'll still be able to run stuff. Then everything you run will either be entirely unauthenticated, or will be run as a superuser with -localauth. I don't think I've ever tried that, but I think it would work. If you never run 'klog' or 'aklog', etc, you don't really need a kdc. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
