Andrew Deason <[email protected]> writes: > That could interfere with versions like 1.6.2.1 that sometimes occur. > Conceptually I could imagine something like maybe 1.6.2.0.120917, but I > don't remember what all the various version rules are for deb and rpm. > And I don't think OS X can handle more than a certain number of version > segments, or something?
For Debian, the best solution is generally for some snapshot taken on 20120917 of source from the 1.6 branch after 1.6.1 to be versioned as 1.6.1+20120917. This sorts after 1.6.1 but before 1.6.1.1. You can use - instead of + provided that you're very careful with how you use version numbers, but it can cause some confusion since - is also used to separate the upstream version from the Debian packaging version. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
