On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:07:57 -0700 Timothy Balcer <[email protected]> wrote:
> In other news, the latest salvage has been running for 12 hours... I > straced the busiest pid and it is happily verifying all the links and > contents (open(), close(), pread() ad infinitum), so its not wedged. > This volume has literally slightly less than 32k directory entries in > various places (yes, I made SURE the limits were observed ;-) ) and so > I imagine it will take a very long time to traverse the entire > thing... interesting that this is the fourth salvage and it actually > seems to be working at it this time. Last three times it stopped after > a bit over an hour. I am just curious; does the machine seem to be cpu-bound during this process? There has been some work done to parallelize this, so in the future this could be faster (if, among other things, it seems cpu-bound and you have multiple cores). > I'll keep you all posted. There wasn't an error in the AFS logs that > indicated that salvager proceses had been killed due to OOM. It was > only in the kernel logs. If you started this via 'bos salvage', there should be something in BosLog to say that it was killed by signal 9. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
