On Do, 2013-02-14 at 09:37 -0600, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:26:21 +0100 > Hans-Werner Paulsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What does happen, when I run 1.4.14 and 1.6.1 db servers > > simultaneously? Is it save to upgrade one db server while the db > > servers with the old versions are still running, when I do NOT modify > > the databases during the upgrade process? > > Like I said above, it should work, but it's not "supported". That is, > I'm not aware of any issues because we haven't changed anything with the > database format or the synchronization behavior. But I believe it's been > implicitly decreed that those could change at any time, so you had > better not get used to running a mixture. > We (more or less accidently) mixed 1.4 and 1.6 DB servers in our very small cell here. Normal operation was fine, we only realized the mixup because restoring/moving volumes only worked for volumes with shorter names (moving/restoring worked, but not all clients could access the data after that).
_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
