On 4/8/13 14:09 , "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>understanding the depths of afs - isn't the afs cache meant to be always >in sync with the server, or is it possible (default?) for the applications >to let go the data before it is confirmed to exist on the server? That is, >if my configuration somehow forces the sync against the default, that >could explain the poor performance. Sorry for asking stupid guestions... There is "fs storebehind" but I don't think that could explain this. :�� T���&j)b� b�өzpJ)ߢ�^��좸!��l��b��(���~�+����Y���b�ا~�����~ȧ~
