Thank you so much for your help.
One more question.
Concerning your statement:
>Clients will cope with some of the
>VLDB servers going away from the client perspective *as long as* the Ubik
>master is one of the ones that doesn't go a way.
Does this mean that I need to keep my current Ubik master ( the server running
with the lowest ip), around permanantly?
If so should the network IP address ranges for my other new DB servers be
higher than the current Ubik master?
Thanks,
Greg
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf
of Russ Allbery [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:08 PM
To: Greg Wilson
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Moving Authen Servers to different IP addresses
Greg Wilson <[email protected]> writes:
> Any thoughts on the final physical location of the 3 servers and network
> bandwith between them?
> Is it better to have them in 3 different physical locations with 3
> different IP's and if so what should be the bandwith between them.
> I notice in the global CellServDB file that may AFS db servers for
> different installations are all in the same subnet.
You may or may not be able to tell. For example, Stanford's are on three
different subnets. We disperse them physically around our campus. The
VLDB doesn't require much in the way of bandwidth; if you have working
network, you're unlikely to notice.
--
Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
