On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:38:19 +0000 "Brunckhorst, Ralf" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is salvaging of volumes needed afterwards in the following scenarios? > > * vos dump -id UNTAG-volume.readonly -time 0 -server SERVER -partition PART > | vos restore -server SERVER -partition PART -name TAG-volume -overwrite > incremental > > * vos dump -id UNTAG-volume.readonly -time 0 -server SERVER -partition PART > | dump-scan_mp | vos restore -server SERVER -partition PART -name TAG-volume > -overwrite full No, you shouldn't need to do that. (Are you sure you don't mean "-overwrite full" in the first example, though?) If you need to salvage after a simple restore, that's probably an issue we need to fix. > We are using this 'strange' workflow to have a workaround for the > limit in openafs of having not more than 11 RO-replicas. It may be easier to use different cells for that (then you can keep the same volume name, and possibly volume id, though the latter might be confusing). If you don't want to duplicate the entire contents of the cell, you can make a cell a kind of "overlay" over an existing cell by using a feature called "linked cells". I can go further into that if you want; I just wanted to mention it. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
