"anonymous" access is unaffected. However, a user with a token that is no longer accepted is not "anonymous"
On 7/30/2013 9:01 AM, Edgecombe, Jason wrote: > Hi everyone, > > After all of the cell's AFS servers are upgraded to 1.6.5 and DES is > disabled, will pre-1.6.5 clients still retain anonymous AFS access via > system:anyuser access and IP ACLs? I understand that authenticated access > will not be possible, but I want to clarify the anonymous access case. > > Thanks, > Jason > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jason Edgecombe | Linux and Solaris Administrator > UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering > 9201 University City Blvd. | Charlotte, NC 28223-0001 > Phone: 704-687-1943 > [email protected] | http://engr.uncc.edu | Facebook > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission or a person > responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any disclosure, > copying, distribution, or other use of any of the information in this > transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission > in error, please notify me immediately by reply e-mail or by telephone at > 704-687-1943. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
