> * Are you using ZFS-on-Linux in production for file servers? Yes.
> * If not, and you looked into it, what stopped you? Long there was fear and doubt, but the (not) "quality" of HW-Raid solutions and hassle of Linux SW-Raid convinced us that it could not be worse with ZFS. > * If you are, how is it working out for you? It does. The are-the-zpools-OK reporting could be more comfortable and the zpool status output is not compatible to the old one. But compared to problems we had before, that's a no-brainer. Don't be surprised if raidz needs CPU power to calculate the checksums, so you need to get the balance between I/O and CPU/cores right for the raidz level you want. > ext3/ext4 people: What is your fsck strategy? Before that we used xfs on HW- and SW-Raid. We had no problems with the xfs part of it. However we felt all the time that the possible max log sizes were 1990-ish. Harald. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
