On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:13:43 -0500 Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> Various code paths were adjusted to try to handle the error as > gracefully as possible, but some were more complex/difficult than > others. A few, such as the specific backtrace you mentioned, have not > hit 1.6 yet, since I was concerned about introducing new/different > errors in the error handling since we didn't really know what was > going on in these scenarios. After some discussion, these are now being considered for inclusion in 1.6.6 (gerrits 10354-10358). If anyone wants more information on this issue, follow ticket 131747 <https://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=131747&user=guest&pass=guest> -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
