On Wednesday 07 May 2014 10:20:59 Harald Barth wrote:
> "In sync" would have been nice, but as "in sync" has been problematic
> in the past and I don't expect that to change, I suggest to go with
> the last suggestion. I would call it "marketing numbers" and these
> should have another range so that they have clearly differing version
> numberings (like the 5.x example from Andrew). Or call the Windows
> versions 14.x this year and 15.x next year. Then we will never reach
> the feared OfW-13 version for sure ;-)
It could even be ${year}.${month}. So it is very easy to guess how old the
client is. In our environment we do not have an automatic installation system
for windows (only two hosts and a few laptops which I see every few years)
Once I already searched the release announcements to find out how old it is...
Markus
--
Markus Koeberl
Graz University of Technology
Signal Processing and Speech Communication Laboratory
E-mail: [email protected]
