On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 17:32 -0500, Andrew Deason wrote: > But even this seems like a good example of why some people are > frustrated or annoyed by all of this. Every single authentication > framework thing needs to have its own AFS plugin, or AFS tool, or > whatever; you just listed two different ones for two different > platforms. Wouldn't it be nice if everyone just needed a "krb5 > plugin/tool/etc" instead of an krb5 and an AFS part? If that were > true, > it would make AFS seem more like a normal (sane) piece of software, > and > not its own weird special case.
For what it's worth, I am seeing more people move to (or start with) NFSv4 and then run into the restrictions imposed by rpc.gssd and become frustrated. This seems to be educational as to why OpenAFS uses tokens. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix openafs kerberos infrastructure xmonad http://sinenomine.net
