On Wednesday 06 August 2014 10:45:56 chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > I started working on a patch to 'fix' this issue:
good to know > But as pointed out in the comments, it's too specific and should be a > more general mechanism. Unfortunately, the preceding '.' is stripped > from names before passing down to afsd for resolution so it wouldn't be > possible to block /afs/.git without also blocking /afs/git Should there not be at least one '.' after removing the one from the begin included to make sense searching for a SRV record? regards Markus Köberl _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
