On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, please say what would work best for you. If you would be able to > help with maintaining the packaging on any of these, also please speak > up. One single option may not work for everyone, but it would be nice to > not have everything scattered more than it needs to be. > Another option is COPR: https://fedorahosted.org/copr/ We'd need to make some changes to the kmod portion of the RPM spec file if we wanted to build there, since it uses a mock build environment to build the packages, and the current openafs spec file uses some variant of `uname -r` to determine the kernel version and not what is provided by the kernel-devel package. This has been something on my list of pet peeves about the current spec file anyway. -- Jonathan Billings <[email protected]> College of Engineering - CAEN - Unix and Linux Support
