Hi Ben,
>> iam using Centos 7 and openafs 1.6.11.1 from source tarball.
> In general when a packaged version of something is available, it should
> be preferred over a source build, since the packaging system tracks which
> files are installed by the package and should allow for cleaner
> uninstalls.
>
> http://openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.6.11.1/openafs-1.6.11.1-1.src.rpm is the
> 1.6.11 srpm, which ought to be buildable into binary rpms with, e.g.,
> mock.
I used this now, but an yum-builddep of this srpm package tells me that
the package:

kernel-devel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-404.el5 is needed but not found on centos
7. centos 7 ist working with 3.10.

I found out that centos 5 is working with kernel 2.6.18.  But its
interesting to see that for RHEL 7 there are packages on the openafs
webseite for release 1.6.8.
>
> -Ben Kaduk

regards,
Andy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to