Hello all! I understand from the documentation that the main difference between `dafileserver` and `fileserver` is the "on-demand-attach" of volumes. However I wonder if there are other advantages / differences between the two, especially with regard to: * performance -- is `dafileserver` more performant than `fileserver`? * reliability -- because (I assume) many cells have migrated to `dafileserver` the "old" `fileserver` gets less used, thus less tested in real deployments; * maintenance -- is the `fileserver` still actively developed and maintained?
I ask this also from the perspective of a small cell operator (for personal purposes), where attach-on-demand is not an issue, and in fact I think I would prefer all my volumes to be attached as early as possible. Thanks, Ciprian. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
