[Replying also to the list, just to mention the benchmarking technique.]
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:11 PM Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote: > The performance issues could be anywhere and everywhere between the > application being used for testing and the disk backing the vice partition. The issue is not the backing disk as using the same benchmarking technique (see bellow) I get around ~270 MiB/s from the actual `/vicepX` files. The technique is simple (i.e. list all files, randomize them, and then `cat` them 128 at a time to `/dev/null`): find . -type f | sort -R | xargs -P 64 -n 128 -- cat > /dev/null Ciprian. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
