On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:44 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. You could use git repack to transfer less files without losing the ability > of incremental updates.
For some reason Git (on the receiving side) although it receives a pack, it unpacks it. However my question also relates to other use-cases where one has to handle large number of files. (Git was just the latest use-case I faced these days where the performance issue poped-up.) > 2. You could turn off sync-after-close in the cache manager, see fs > storebehind. This should increase upfront performance but may degrade again, > should your cache run out of file handles. So, you'd have to play with cache > parameters, as well. I've already set storebehind to 16 MiB, which is well above the average size of a Git object. Moreover I've even tried to use `-sync never` to the fileserver and these didn't make much difference. Thanks, Ciprian. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
