On 7/14/22 5:49 AM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Ed Rude:
I think I prefer the new behavior you are suggesting as the default.
I'd prefer to have the current behavior as default, as to not break
current scripts. Admins can then decide to enhance their scripts as
needed instead of being forced to change them because they got broken.
On the other hand, I'd prefer a diminishing number of broken scripts vs.
a future of less than ideal defaults, especially if some warning is
issued ahead of the change.
Backwards compatibility has it's place: in the past, mostly.
--
+-------------------------------------------------------+
/ Todd Lewis, Middleware Services,[email protected] /
/ "We is confronted with insurmountable opportunities." /
/ - Walt Kelly, "Pogo" /
+-------------------------------------------------------+
