Committed revision 1767.

Thanks

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 09:03 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> ACK.
> Looks sane to me
> 
> #elif with no clause is clearly wrong and continuing when we don't
> know the byte order only defers the problem to a point where its much
> harder to debug
> 
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:54, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > gcc-4.4 (as shipped in fedora rawhide) is a lot more paranoid.
> >
> > The patch fix the only build failure in corosync, but there are tons of
> > serious warnings that we should urgently look into.
> >
> > Fabio
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openais mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
> >

_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to