> If your application requires virtual synchrony, then the only way to > handle > partitions is to terminate one part (and force it to restart with no > history) > to preserve a common history among the remaining nodes. Merging > doesn't make > sense because the VS history has already diverged.
All you need is a common state, and a defined order of messages. A common history is not needed (why)? _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list Openais@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
